@Richard Butler - Yes, bigger is better. But bigger is also bigger. And bigger/better tends to have diminishing returns to the average user. You're coming from the position of a pixel peeper, because after all, that is your job: to measure things that the naked eye can't see at normal viewing distances. I'm just saying that for most users of this camera, it'll be better than lugging around a big FF DSLR lens of comparable spec. This is kind of the bane of technical equipment review sites: we get into the minutiae of equipment and testing and numbers, and in doing so it can take us farther away from actual photography. You are absolutely right. And what would these sites do without all this technical equipment minutiae talk? But the conversation is also a bit sad. (Although I'm sure there are some here who are getting super excited about it). Sure, I suppose I should have said "It sure beats carrying around a 600mm f/11 on FF".